The first days of this political administration showed the risks of homogeneous understanding of civil rights. There is a disturbing amount of people who do not understand the difference between diversity, fair and integration initiatives (Dei) and the relationship between the EEO Policy (EEO) and justice for all.
When the White House to publish The executive order “ending illegal discrimination and restoring the merit -based opportunities” on January 21, took the matter to Dei in the name of the 1964 Civil Rights Law. This was especially ridiculous. Moreover, the matter has significantly eliminated the 1965 job opportunities base, which the then president used to Lindon B. Johnson to close a loophole related to government contractors. EEO’s anti -discrimination origins began in federal workers. Since then it has been used as a standard holder in almost all organizations, whether private, governmental, work, education, etc.
The political opponents of Dei and the equal efforts of opportunities in a manner indicating that they will not be beneficial to African Americans, who in itself and inciting racism. Certainly, initiatives that help black are viable due to the continuous legacy of regular racism. However, civil rights legislation, not a flowing economy, was “the rising tide that raises all boats”. This policy has sought to eliminate racist inequality, but also gave way to old women and warriors and those who are disrupted and people LGBTQ+.
Why did we write this
How many times have we put our hands on our hearts and declared us, “with freedom and justice for all”? Quite simply, the rule of equal job opportunities in 1965 canceled the president who canceled his first week, an American of the wealthy, as our column writer writes.
He ran a modest bulletin at my memory storage site. It is a bulletin that may see one in most of the workplace. “Equaling the opportunity to work is the law”, read the head, with “law” with bold black letters. I learned for the first time of EEO during my city in Mottini Augusta, Georgia. I watched the black administration managers facing their discrimination episodes, and at the same time fighting for fairness to others. It is very similar to the paradox in the use of civil rights legislation to cancel the Dei, and watching black women face attacks due to due care in the field of equality in the field of rights that has not escaped from me.
One of these directors was Jacqueline Humphrey, who led EEO to the city for six years until it was separated in 2015. Federal complaintShe claims that she was a victim of discrimination in the workplace. In her instead, she argued that her rank was reduced and then ended after she made a complaint against another exit. She and the city reached a settlement. She arrived at Mrs. Humphrey to get her point of view on EEO.
“[People] “Do not understand the constitutional rights behind what EEO represents and what it means,” she says on the phone. “Organizations do not want employees to have an insight into their rights, because after that they will have to unite that they are fair in how to distribute money, positions and contracts.”
The other director was the iPhone Genri, who led the Central Business Foundation program in the city. 200 Study of contrast It refers to the origins of the 1995 program, and the 1994 investigation. The program was created in the wake of “convincing evidence of a great contrast between the use of minority sellers and women and their availability in the Richmond Province Market area, mostly due to the previous and current effects of discrimination.”
The contrast, of course, talks about the differences in treatment and opportunities. When accessed over the phone, Mrs. Jindari explains how the programs designed to help those deprived of providing road maps for people who rarely participate with the government from the work perspective.
“Often, people do not know where to go,” says Ms. Jenkri. This was the goal of the program, and not to make sure that minorities occurred [preferential treatment]”
She adds that the Trump administration attacks on Dei seem targeted towards non -whites.
“The diversity is a wide brush. It says:” It can mean that black, Asian, handicapped and a lot of things. “It does not follow [unqualified] Eggs. It follows the minorities. “
While there are countless heroes to preserve equal rights, modern civil rights work can be returned to one man: Martin Luther King Junior on the day of son and the next day, because, simply, Dr. King gave his life to legislate civil rights.
History tends to speak inhibitors about the relationship of Dr. King and then President Johnson regarding civil rights. The truth is less romantic. The two greatly worked under tension and secretly due to the presence of Jim Crowe, which is waving on the horizon. Moreover, the FBI sought to intimidate Dr. King, and President Johnson did not interfere. However, the deep policy came out of their exhibition cooperation.
This, among other reasons, is the reason that DEI’s criticism requires more differences. There are entities that say they are unfair, despite the legacy of Jim Crowe and the need for merit -based employment. But there are others who claim that Dei does not specifically target people who are colored, and in some cases, he will whiteness.
There are ways to make Dei more fair without eliminating them. Moreover, unifying the conditions of civil rights in the popular language led to the type of misunderstanding that endangers the basic legislation at risk.
Dei describes the Matter Lives Post-Black campaign that sought to fairly between the educated class, which is definitely related. But this last attack is an example of how to use a DEI anti -letter to harm normative bearing legislation.
The Civil Rights Law of 1964, of course, is still the Law of the Earth. The private and governmental sector employees are still protected from discrimination. But here is a major section to remind us of the importance EEO ruling of 1965: “The policy of the United States government is to provide equal opportunities in federal workers for all qualified persons, the prohibition of discrimination in work due to race, belief, color, or national origin, and enhancing the full investigation of equal employment opportunity through a positive and continuous program in each executive and agency department. It applies. Equal Opportunities in every aspect of federal employment policy.
How many times have we put our hands on our hearts and declared us, “with freedom and justice for all”? Simply, this act is American.