Once Prince Harry and Meghan Markle faces the media in the United States in the United States, they are now facing a remarkable shift in coverage.
After their dramatic departure from the British royal family, the couple initially received strong media support after they settled in the United States. However, it seems that many prominent American ports are now running out of the Duke and the Duchess of Sussex.
Modern reports indicate that publications like Vanity Fair and The Cut, along with the Spotify giant, have reconsidered their association with the couple, and avoiding the admiration they received before.
Initial support for the American media for Sosixx
When Harry and Meghan arrived in the United States, the American media became immediately busy supporting and listed their new lives. This was evident in the aftermath of his car in 2021 with Oprah Winfrey, where Harry and Meghan took charge of racism and planning against the British royal family.
The accusations against the property sparked a reaction from the citizens. Social media was fond of sympathy for the two until the demand to end the British monarchy. Meanwhile, Harry and Meghan firmly became the candidates for the press in the United States.
However, the honeymoon period did not last forever.
Check the new reality of Vanity Fair on Harry and Meghan
The change in the tone of the media follows many setbacks and differences that hinder the activities of Harry and Meghan’s prominent commercial.
On January 17, Vanity Fair 8000 words were printed regarding the spouses. The title “American Hustle” is closely noticed by their ambitious, but troubled projects in America, which is a sharp contradiction with positive reports about it in the past.
The article included a mixture of accusations, including the alleged discussions of Migan on the “post -epithelial” book deal and complaints about its sabotage behavior in Monteesito. This was far from the first days in which Vanity Fair was the first magazine to give Megan a glowing coverage feature in 2017, which helped her define her in the world.
However, in December, Prince Harry to treat Speculation about alleged divorce. We have divorced, perhaps 10 or 12 times as well. So it is completely, what? It is difficult to keep up with it, but for this reason you ignore it. He said while speaking at the top of the New York Times for 2024.
But this was not. Take the allegation game to the next level, the article also described Meghan as acting as a medium girl. “
AFP / Angela Weiss
“She is constantly playing the auditor – I will not even say chess – but she is fully aware of the whereabouts of everyone on board,” in, you must throw wolves at any specific moment.
However, according to the media ReportsA source close to Sussexes came to defend the couple. The singers of the claim about an enemy work environment sponsored by the couple, described the people who previously worked with them as “sad”.
But the question here is what led to the repercussions of the post and Sussexes?
According to the media ReportsThe relationship between them began to bounce when it claims that the couple accused Vanity Fair of publishing a “racist title” in the story of Megan’s cover of October 2017.
According to Valentin, if in her book, Varhnoun: The hidden force behind the crown, even in a supportive article, Megan did not estimate that the subject of the article was about Harry’s relationship. She even objected, according to reports, on the cover line, saying that he was racist, and both tried to change the title of the electronic version.
Unfortunately, Vanity Fair is not the only American media that carries beef with Sussexes now.
to cut
The pieces were one of the first American publications to indicate a shift in its coverage of the Cisx. In August 2022, Megan Markle granted a very student interview published under the title “Megan from Monteesito‘
However, the interview, which was initially received, became a source of intellectual response, especially after Megan made comments that seemed to criticize the royal family.
In the interview, Megan discussed how the couple’s decision to step down from royal duties has disturbed the dynamism of the property, which caused criticism from readers who considered her notes “rude.
Fast forward until December 2024, and the cutting was again in the main headlines of the couple. piece Entitled “Harry and Meghan projects cannot stop volatility,” she pointed to the latest Netflix series, Polo, noting that the show was already receiving negative reviews.
Spotify
When Harry and Meghan signed a 15 million pounds deal with Spotify in 2020, many believed that he would prepare them as media purposes in the American market.
Spotify ended the original models of the couple despite launching a great anticipation during the first broadcast season in June 2023. Multiple internal sources indicated that Harry and Meghan did not say the requirements of productivity because the evidence showed that their ideas lacking direction and loneliness.
The podcast, which focuses on the stereotype created by Megan, has failed to attract celebrity guests such as Beyonce and Taylor Swift, which led to her destruction and Harry in the market.
Soon the perception of a Nami year was followed after Spotify to stop Support: Harry and Meghan media projects have failed to achieve the level of the audience’s required participation.
Hollywood Observer
In September 2024, Hollywood Observer Explore the in -depth professional conflict in Sussex by highlighting the high turnover of their team.
“Every terrified person from Megan,” is a source close to the alleged spouses in the article, describing it as “a dictator in high heels.” This negative image followed Megan’s previous accusations that she was a victim of a distortion campaign related to her time in the royal family.
The article by Hollywood Reporter asked about the couple’s ability to manage their affairs effectively, as multiple sources of the alleged bullying of Meghan participated.
Is the Sussex story losing its brilliance?
Moreover, criticism is not only limited to the media. Apparently, according to reports, the Americans “don’t really care” with Cisx anymore.
In Podcast, Royal expert Kinsey Chaufdd said that the son of Donald Trump Eric has the correct idea when he said, “The Americans do not care about Bhary.” She also added, “We lost our interest in Bahari and Meghan after we realized that we gave them a lot of credit over the years,” she added.
In addition, those familiar with industry like Stacy Jones He said Harry and Meghan’s influence in Hollywood “cool” has “cools”, where there is no enthusiasm surrounding their future projects. What was considered by a weak, convincing story has become a stressful narration that some Americans lose their attention.