It is the end of an era, but it does not seem to be a better start. Barbara Broccoli and Michael J. Wilson, daughter and friend of James Bond producer, Albert R. Brukoli, for their long creative control over the USD concession, prevents billionaires from seizing the world billionaires.
They gave this creative control of one of the billionaires who are currently taking over the world.
Amazon MGM Studios, owned by Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos, acquired the James Bond series in 2022, after the final batch of Daniel Craig, “No time to die in an incorrect” (spoiler alert: it was literally Bond time to die). The Brocley family kept sending its creative control in this acquisition, which was expected to be closely guarded by the concession 007 and supervising its direction since its inception. This was the anger of many Bond fans who want to see more radical changes in a privilege that has repeatedly fought for the relevant survival over the past 63 years, with a notorious mixed success. Then again, many Bond fans want anything to change it. never.
Barbara Brocoli was questioning the Amazon purchasing the series. In fact, this places it moderate. It was claimed that the executives of Amazon were “Ridiculous numbered.” Now, after three years of struggle to find a new creative direction for James Bond – directed by Amazon, the only TV series “007: Road to a million” (you have never heard or already forgot about it) – Amazon MGM Studios can To do whatever they want with the property.
It is a frightening time in the world in general, in part, because billionaires like Jeff Bezos have large parts of it and are increasingly practicing a disturbing amount of control. Like “Tomorrow”, the wicked “Elliot Carvef, played by Jonathan Press, is now a multimedia. And changing the course of American history several times. , Mark Zuckerberg, Medal of Obay, Disney Cambon, and the billionaire owner of the Los Angeles Times, and Patrick Sun Chung, arrives at the billionaire President Donald Trump.
If Jeff Bezos does not allow a newspaper with a political history of political comments, it runs a comic tape of one plate that chants himself, and one can not help in asking whether there is any opportunity for the new James Bond movies-or a TV series, or TV series, or TV series, another choosing Amazon stripping this drug – will have anything similar to principles anymore. James Bond was not a particularly sabotage figure. It does not become a billion dollar privileges by destroying the institution completely, because the institution has all the money. But he did not oppose at least dictators, corrupt politicians and thirsty billionaires. Which will make it Very relevant today.
James Bond has been kicking billionaire for a long time until his most disrupted is related again. “Moonraker”, the (profitable) concession attempt for the milk of the scientific age in the aftermath of the “Star Wars”, is often criticized as one of the franchise installments. However, her vision of the corrupt corrupt capitalist who has privatized travel to space and wants to end the modern world to build a new image in its own image, in space, now it makes it one of the most bad guys in Bond, because in practice it is a preliminary model for Elon Musk. Even Golfenger Al -Ettani will have been torn from the audio lines today, since then, since then The current president, who is obsessed with gold, is trying to enter Fort Nox.
Can we really expect James Bond kicking the billionaire donkey again? Carbps barely fluctuated, so they may not have been entirely hidden, but at least they were ready for a side punch. What kind of villain will A super spy works with billionaire that cannot allow a fight to fight?
Unfortunately, we are about to know that. It is possible, of course, to take Bezos Laissez-FAIRE The approach to James Bond production, and allowing executives and directors in his work do what they want with Franchi … Oh waiting, he really threatens ideas. There is this little imagination.
Then again, it is fair to say that the privilege of James Bond was always successful, even under the broccoli family. What movies are visits and which one that misses, but? This is a matter of hot discussion. There are 007 admirers who want the hero to be flagrant and dangerous, and others who love light and the father. Even the so -called James Bond movies “worse” have defenders. I have met people who believe that a good “ghost”. (To quote Rip is torn in “Defending your Life”: I don’t want that Shout With them … but I met them.)
But the worst James Bond films did not make it, yet, by Elliot Carver, while he was absorbed to Auric Goldfinger, while he was leaving Hugo Drax to undermine the US government. Perhaps Amazon MGM Studios will make a good movie James Bond, a good, live TV series, or a good restarting for “James Bond JR.” But the fact that they even feel that they contradict the entire concept of 007, and the dangerous interpretations and its looked alike. James Bond took a position against the thirsty capitalists for more than half a century. Certainly he sold some cars and wrist hours along the road, but at least he does not let these superior to tell him what to do.
So far, I think.
