Left media has identified a dangerous new political political model: the kind and fertile republican woman.
Beware of the booming “Women’s Cover” urges an audience of young women away from feminism and towards marriage, children, and being attractive, Warn The guardian. The port refers to prominent conservative commentators such as Brett Cooper and Andes Owens, as well as leaflets such as Evi magazine, as a symbol of this counterpart called “Manusvir”. (Related: American fertility rates continue to decline as the millennial generation faces financial fears, marriage later | daily caller)
These women are united by “their desire to return to seeing the world between the sexes,” according to The Guardian, who receives “women as bounds of bid” and “men as a strong presenter.”
Oh, horror. The “gender” indicates a strange belief that men and women are different. One free to extract various conclusions from this fact. The left has taken a strange fight with the concept of biological sex itself, an argument that defeats itself at first. How can one analyze why pendants specifically appeal to females without admitting the health of the category?
The port warns of an “organized effort” to create “an alternative ecosystem for right -wing media targeting American young women.” One of them distinguishes the director’s terrorism in the possibility – no wonder, given the “podcast strategy” that has been very perpetuated, helped to beat young voters to Donald Trump in the 2024 elections.
The word “organization” is supposed to be a dirty word. It refers to a treacherous major plan to get women out of birth control and put them on fast diets. But the old media, with its extreme left -wing bias, is certainly not organized and organized in its political and cultural recipes from the “right -wing media”. Note not to symmetry in terms of conditions. The New York Times and Netflix are simply media. They call a neutral floor. It is a strong rhetorical trick. If they can successfully confirm themselves as unbiased observers and artists, they are designing the reality itself through them.
This strategy turns the acceptable window to the left. Certainly, they say, we welcome the diversity of opinion – anywhere between Hillary Clinton and Tesla Vandal. Any objections to left -wing are easily distinguished and rejected as “extremist”. Including the objections imposed by the Democratic Party members just twenty years ago.
Hillary Clinton speaks against gay marriage 20 years ago pic.twitter.com/pnkgnskg
Ian Corsen (Anicorine) July 16, 2024
“I think marriage is not just a bond, but rather a sacred bond between a man and a woman,” said the younger Clinton. “It is between a man and a woman who dates back to the fog of history as one of the foundational and foundational institutions of history, humanity and civilization.”
Many looks like the “Women Cover” point.
“Young women are particularly exposed to these calls,” according to the Guardian newspaper. This is a feminist proposal: Women deserve the same rights as men, but they are creatures without an agent capable of any of the same responsibilities. It seems not born of logic, but political maneuvering. Feminist themselves is associated with equality language to hide the cheap goal: good and endless things. This, at the expense of both men and women.
The Guardian blames the conservative commentators for “benefiting from a real crisis of unity” among young people.
“Conservatives do not focus on TRUE Issues, “left -wing,” such as making sure that third -graders have a strong understanding of prostitution and slavery. “The stabs are always mixed to the left from the left because of their automatic inability to wake up.
“Do not let them deceive us in thinking that we can separate us from the rural and urban areas,” said Democratic Representative Alexandria Okasio Cortez (AOC) in a modern gathering. “Black, black and Latin. Notice the value of its producers. Even in a sentence calling for unity, it can only be removed from “white”.
Do not let them deceive you in thinking that we are enemies.
Do not let them deceive you in thinking that we can separate us into rural, urban, white, black and bright areas.
We are one. pic.twitter.com/5rfxo1ojat
– Team aoc (teamaoc) April 23, 2025
More than that to this point: Why should one not tie the unit to young people with a culture that drowns the left? At least, one must recognize the relationship between increasing alienation and high equality. There does not seem to be a strange guess that men and women may be happier and comfortable with each other if you assume some “old” sex standards. And basic hygiene and fitness. (Related: Rock: Sufficient enough, all dating applications | Daily caller)
“Young women have been welcomed The blessing of democracy of the Democratic Party“The power that will save us from all angry young people who spend all their time listens to podcast, but this is not given,” says The Guardian.
Here lies the acceptance of a patient. The Democratic Party prefers women, fats, sterility, single and non -happy. Why? Because these women make the most ideologies. The left is the natural hierarchical sequence. It flies ugly and the disease above the beautiful. Any natural mile is punished towards the latter. This appeals to the distinguished who depend on such an infrastructure to give them the situation and meaning. Or green card, as it might be.
Who benefits from a gentle and fertile woman? Why, just the woman herself, young people interested in dating and marrying them, her future family, and the rest of society in extension. The supposed left’s interest in female “freedom” and “independence” is wrong. They only preferred that women depend on the state, not the husband.
Follow Natalie Sandoval on X: @natalierene03