Kimi Badnouch was accused of violating a promise that was presented to the Conservative Party during its leadership campaign after abandoning the party’s commitment to reach Safar by 2050.
Talk to observerChris Skidor, who served as a government minister between 2016 and 2020, said that Badnouch explained to a group of Conservative Party deputies and other conservatives in leadership in 2022, when she was seeking to obtain their voices in the race to replace Boris Johnson, and it supports politics.
Skidmore said he remembers, “How did I tell a conservative environment network of 60 deputies that I have organized with it [former business and energy secretary] Alock Sharma is a leadership in the year 2022 that secured zero zero – and made this promise unique to all of us. “
“I was conducting a net zero review, I spoke with it during the meeting of the Council of Ministers headed by a policeman[26] President Awk Sharma once again restored the importance of net scratch for green trade and building international supply chains.
“So the speech [last] The week seems surprising, especially as it also seems to return to the commitment of 2024. “
Another source of the Conservative Party, which was in 2022 Hustings, confirmed that during a special meeting, Badenoch said it would support Safi’s policy, although the source added that it seemed to have changed its position shortly after Hustings.
Badnosh caused the panic among the green conservatives last week when I was homogeneously abandoned, saying that politicians need cleaning with voters that Safar was “impossible” to achieve “without a serious decrease in our living standards or by bankruptcy.”
She added, “We must stop pretending the next generation. We have to stop the government with the press statement,” she added.
“This is exactly the reason that the political class has lost confidence. The only way we can recover is to tell the unwanted truth – zero zero by 2050 is impossible.”
After her speech, the Teresa May, who presented the goal when the Prime Minister, replied that “zero zero by 2050 is a challenge but it can be achieved … It is supported by the scientific community and supports the independent climate change committee as not only necessary but not implemented and costly effective.”
The former Minister of Conservative Cabinet, John Gomer, who chaired Lord Debden, said the Climate Change Committee from 2012 to 2023, that he seemed that he had not spoken to anyone in the party who was involved at the highest levels in the feasibility study of Safar Safar by 2050, and it did not seem that it had not taken on board several results through official sphere.
Dean said: “You thought she would have been talking to the Climate Change Committee, which was created under the conservatives to provide such independent advice,” said Dean.
He added that her approach will be “very harmful” and harms “green investment” in the United Kingdom, in addition to leading to high electricity prices by making the country depend on oil and gas for a longer period.
“Playing over the past decade has continued to address the climate crisis and improve the environment to be among the priorities of voters under the age of 40,” said Ryan Shorethus, CEO of Bright Blue Thinktank, who was the first right -right organization calling for a net legal goal by 2050.
“There is independent and strict evidence that clear zero emissions in the UK can be achieved by 2050, but only if good policies are now developed to support people on a modest income with the costs and changes of transition. There will be unsustainable costs for both our environment and the economy if we do not achieve net zero emissions in the middle of this century.
“The extravagant policy means exceeding the political situation, political composition, and focus instead on designing and implementing detailed policies supporting the market to reduce carbon emissions. Conservatives must learn about long -term economic benefits of large green growth, especially in coastal and industrial areas, and the importance of transferring a better environment to the next generation.”
Skidmore, who resigned from the MP and from The Tory Whip last year after the Rishi Sunak government announced plans for the new annual oil and gas licensing rounds, that if Badenoch believed that getting rid of net zero would help increase support to its party, it was wrong, said Skidmore, who resigned from the MP and from The Tory Whip last year after the Rishi Sunak government announced plans for new annual oil and gas licensing rounds.
“The real conservatives are not as retrospective like reform – they know that the best way to predict the future is to form it and not play your back.
“For those voters who suffer from zero networks and do not take climate change seriously, they will not be turned-after all, it enhances in their minds the issue of voting in favor of reform.
“Therefore, it is a very strange strategy that will cost votes in local elections, as it is now possible that the most moderate conservatives will move away from Badenosh, while enhancing reform at the same time.”
Before London College of Economics I found that although access to zero by 2050 will initially cost between 1 % and 2 % of total local products (GDP) per year, it will save money by 2040.
Badnush itself did this point In Parliament In 2022: “Our recent estimates put net zero costs at less than 2 % of gross domestic product-just similar when we legitimized them two years ago-with low low carbon technologies costs faster than expected.”
A spokeswoman for the Conservative Party leader indicated that she made clear her reservations about zero -zero achievement by 2050 as Hustings was held in 2022.