President Trump leaves after talking to correspondents in the Great Foree during a tour of the John F. Kennedy for theatrical arts on Monday.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Hide the explanatory name
Switch the explanatory name
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
A federal judge in Washington, DC, issued a preliminary order against the Trump administration because of its attempt to ban sexually transformed forces in the US military.
On Tuesday’s decision from the American boycott judge Anna Reese, the Ministry of Defense temporarily prevents the continuation of a political guidance designed to remove the sexual service members of the army.
In an overwhelming opinion, Reese retreated against the administration’s efforts, and wrote that the ban had violated the constitutional rights of the transgender forces.
“In fact, the harsh paradox is that thousands of transgender soldiers have sacrificed – some of them risk their lives – to ensure very equal protection rights that the military embargo seeks to deny,” Reyes wrote.
The initial dyspower is the latest example of a federal court that moves to stop or prevent the efforts made by President Trump to age his agenda through executive procedures. The fixed goods of orders against the president raised concerns between Trump’s critics that the administration may choose in a timely manner to challenge the decision of the Federal Court and raise a possible constitutional crisis.
Trump pledged to abide by the court’s decisions, saying that he would appeal the rulings in which the judges stood against the administration. At the same time, he publicly criticized the federal judges who ruled against him.
There are about 1.3 million military service employees. The Ministry of Defense has told NPR that an estimated 4,240 members of active service service, or less than 1 % of the forces, have sex defects. But others put the number higher. Palm Center, Research Institute that calls for LGBTQ+ in the US Army, The ability in 2018 The number of transgender forces was about 14,700.
The challenge was brought by six members of the transgender service and potential service members in response to January 27 Executive order This sought to prevent transnational forces from service in the army and directing the Pentagon to launch a plan to implement it within 30 days.
The executive order described the identity of the transgender as harmful to military readiness, and wrote that “the armed forces have been afflicted with a radical sexual ideology to satisfy activists who are not interested in military service requirements such as physical health and structure, self -denial, and unity cohesion.”
It is a language that Rais assumed its decision.
“The president has power – in fact commitment – to ensure military readiness,” she wrote. “Sometimes, leaders used anxiety of military readiness to deny marginalized people of service concession.”
In February, the Pentagon moved to start implementing the request with Politics Memorandum The service members or applicants for military service have a “diagnosis, date or date or presenting symptoms agreed with, sexual digestion” as “incompatible” with American military service.
Political guidance called for new procedures to identify service members who suffer from the gender defect or its history and “start separation procedures”.
On the 2024 campaign, Trump took critical positions on many issues related to the transgender Americans.
In addition to pledged to the restrictions imposed on military service, Trump tried to follow up on many promises of campaigns. Executive orders have been signed to prevent sexually transformed persons from participating in women’s sports, ending the use of gender medical care for children and adolescents and imposes that the government only recognizes the two sexes.
Some of this procedure fell on the old warriors. On Monday, the Ministry of Old Warriors Affairs announced that it would reduce access to medical treatment for old warriors with sex defects.
Tuesday’s decision was celebrated by Law Law, one of the LegtQ+ legal groups that represent the plaintiffs in the case.
“The decisive judgment today is talking about volumes,” said Jennifer Levy, director of transgender and strange rights. “The unambiguously realistic results lie in how this prohibition is specifically aimed at and undermines the courageous service members who committed themselves to defending our nation.”