One of the ongoing puzzles about storming DOGE in the computer system is the super -sensitive payments in the Ministry of Treasury is what Treasury Secretary Scott Payette means, as well as administration officials and other lawyers by accessing “only reading”. For beginners, it is not clear that “reading only” is actually a privilege level on the regulations concerned. But this is a kind of technical details. More importantly, both of them Wireless TPM has independently reported that the operative company Doge Elez, which is now defined, is actually, has privileges at the official level of the same system. In other words, not “only read”, but completely access to anything to do anything if they choose it. This is not what people think when they hear “only reading.” So what is this? Is the treasury minister or lawyers of the Ministry of Justice who went to the court lying? Are there some technology that we do not think about?
Earlier today, it speculated that the problem may be a distinction between data and symbol. As I indicated after that, I do not know any evidence that they changed any data and it is not clear why they wanted it. So perhaps this is the answer: a deceptive claim, but it is still accurate.
After doing some additional reports, I can now say very confidently that this He is In fact the case. When they say they only have a “reading” access, they talk about data, not the code, although the officials’ privileges and the ability to change the code base were essential to all public conversation on this topic.
Once we focus on this distinction, everything is located in place. It is misleading but not wrong.
To understand this, you have to look at the legal case that prompted this to court. The claim is very narrow, and it relates to government employees who say their personal data is exposed to non -governmental employees or people who are technical but not really. Since this is the basis of the lawsuit, the way prosecutors entered the court, this is the only question related to litigation purposes. Whether the dogs have professionals to write to the code or if they changed the symbol-this is completely not related to the purposes of this issue. It may be a huge deal for one million reasons but not for this issue.
If you look closely at The letter sent the Ministry of Treasury official In response to questions from Senator Ron Widan, this distinction is actually clarified … if you read closely. “Treasury employees who work with Tom Crawr, the treasury employee, will only have a reading access. To encrypted data Of the financial service payment systems … “(Emphasizing).
It simply does not treat whether they have any control or the ability to change the symbol. In the court case is not related to the matter. In this message, this is as true as we know about the data. This is correct. The fact that the people who read it believe that this is a denial of reports that dogs have received writing estimates of the symbol … well, I think they are lying if people feel confused about what they refer to specifically by “reading- only,” and not their problem .
So yes, this is the answer. In practice, these rams are not a denial of the entire question about the reason for giving Marco Elise-apparently the first employee in the administration who has already benefited from the resignation program-this level that baffles the mind from controlling this critical system, and what he did with these privileges.