The Republican Party won in the last elections in any small part because of its new attractiveness with the working -class voters, a transformation of leaving many in Washington wondering whether it was a sustainable reorganization in full swing.
But Republicans in the economic agenda are now gathering on the Capitol Hill, and will help the wealthy Americans, all during the restoration of programs that provide health care and food to the poor.
The separation has left some Republicans to feel nervous about whether they are abandoning the newly discovered support base. Democrats, who are looking for weakness, dare Republicans to plan to take them from the poor to give the wealthy, a line of attack that they believed to have helped them restore power during President Trump’s first term.
Who is helping and who is harmful to the plans of Republicans is formed to be central questions for the Republican Party project where they are trying to pressure legislation through their narrow majority in Congress. On Tuesday, the House of Representatives adopted a budget plan that calls for tax cuts $ 4.5 trillion and 2 trillion dollars in spending cuts, along with $ 300 billion in new defense and border financing and an increase in debt limit.
The House of Representatives voting was just the first step in what could be a circular way to convert plans into a law. The Republican Senate has its own ideas for the party’s business schedule, and the two chambers will have to agree on the extensive strokes of the legislation before they can move forward in passing it on the party lines.
Some Republicans in the House of Representatives who supported the budget plan said this week that they hope that the Senate will eventually tear their plans. It is almost certain that making work in the mathematics plan in the House of Representatives require discounts on programs for the poor such as Medicaid, which provides health care for more than 70 million Americans. Actor Jeff van Drew, a Republican in New Jersey, said that he had recorded Mr. Trump to avoid deep discounts in Medikid.
He does not want Medicaid discounts on people working hard. He knows this is the new majority. This is the vast majority of the Republican Party, and this is the right thing to do. “” The Senate will correct it. “
The difficulty that stems from the expensive tax schedule for Republicans. However, their plans are evolving, they want to reduce taxes, and the party’s financial falcons demand to reduce spending also to help fill this financial hole. Analysts say that the federal government imposes large taxes on the wealthy and focuses a lot of its spending on the poor, both on both taxes and spending, or the benefits of the wealthy on the poor.
“They reduce taxes in a retrieval and reduce spending, and it is also a retreat,” said Kyle Pomirlo, who is studying the tax policy at the American Institute of Institutions, a conservative research tank.
The American tax system is progressing, as it pays the highest 1 percent of Americans more than 30 percent of taxes that the federal government gathered every year, according to Treasury data. Therefore, tax cuts such as those whose Republicans hope will provide the largest benefits to the wealthy Americans who pay more than taxes, which means that policy declines even if they still return money to the working class.
Looking at the priority of the Supreme Republic taxes this year: the continued tax cuts issued by the party in 2017. Among the measures ending at the end of the year, the marginal tax rates are less through income arches, a more generous standard standard and tax deduction, which aims at low -income America.
Most Americans have seen less taxes due to the bill, and Republicans see it as a political necessity to maintain current discounts. Do this would provide relatively little to poor Americans who do not pay much taxes. An analysis of the tax policy center, a research tank, has shown that Americans in 20 percent of the owners of papers, who make up up to $ 33,900, will witness an average increase by 0.6 percent-or $ 130-at their income after taxes if the tax cuts are extended.
This is smaller than 1.8 per cent. It is much smaller than 3.2 percent, or 70,350 dollars, increases income after taxes provided by the extension of tax cuts to the top 1 percent, who achieve more than a million dollars annually.
Republicans are studying additional tax cuts that can provide more benefits to high -income Americans. Even the tax exemptions of companies that help develop the economy are still mainly flowing to the owners of companies, who are usually rich.
Another idea is to lift the maximum value of $ 10,000 on local and local tax discounts that have been placed as part of the 2017 tax cuts. Any increase in the so -called salt deduction will accumulate for American -people with higher incomes who may owe many real estate taxes on their valuable homes, for example.
Republicans are defending their tax plans, which are arguing can help develop the economy and help raise wages for American working -class Americans. Actor Judy C. Arangton, the Republic of Texas and Chairman of the House of Representatives Budget Committee, said that the discounts of spending with tax cuts can illuminate the economy by reducing the amount that the federal government must borrow to pay the tax reduction costs.
He said this week: “If you are lowering taxes, they will say that crowding from private capital because you borrow more would compensate for some of the possibilities of positive economic growth that will come from tax cuts.” “But when you cut spending, you reduce the impact of crowding.”
Since their plans are still primary, Republicans have not yet clarified how they will achieve the required spending discounts in the Parliament’s budget plan. They said they do not want to get rid of health care of children and other weak Americans, although many of them seem open to cancel the federal aid enhanced adults who include expanding the program under reasonable prices.
Under this law, the federal government pays a lot of the cost of providing care for Americans who earn up to 138 percent of the level of federal poverty, equivalent to $ 20,780 per person or $ 35,630 for a three -family family, according to the priority center in budget and politics, a liberal research tank.
Republicans are discussing a reduction in the amount of money granted by the federal government to the states to provide health care to these people, a change that may endanger the coverage of millions of these Americans. For low -income Americans, Medicaid is likely to have a greater loss of value than any gains stipulated in their income taxes.
“Brendan Duke, the first manager of federal financial policy at the Budget and Politics Priority Center, is likely to overcome,” Brendan Duke, the first director of federal financial policy at the Budget and Politics Priorities Center, is likely to dominate Brendan Duke, the first manager. For federal financial policy at the Budget and Politics Priority Center, “discounts are likely to overcome Medicid, they are likely to overwhelm any discounts in the Tourism Directorate” is likely to “likely to”
During the campaign, Mr. Trump proposed a large number of new tax policies targeting voters from the working class, including ending taxes on additional work, advice and social security. Republican lawmakers were not sure whether they could find money to save many of these ideas, which may not do this in any case to help low -income Americans who do not owe income taxes.
For some Republicans, follow -up of an agenda that reduces taxes and spending is frustrating, given the way the party’s support has changed over time. Such an agenda may have made some political meaning when Republicans have received more support from the wealthy Americans. Orine Cas, founder of “Tank Research”, said, not anymore.
He said: “They have this old text who believe that they are supposed to read and say that we will reduce taxes on high -income families and reduce the benefits to the poor.” “This has always been an incredibly stupid text, but the Republican Party believed that it should follow once every time. Now the Republican Party does not think it should continue to do so, but they still wandering blindly as if this was what they are supposed to do.”