Borinma Ramaru and Balagi Rammorethy in OpenAi, the outstanding city of Openai. According to reports, the former Openai’s parents claim to cover up the death of their son.
According to A lawsuit, Aji’s parents claim a conspiracy, noting that the real cause of their son’s death is murder, not suicide. The deposit stated that San Francisco PD failed to conduct a comprehensive investigation before his ruling as suicide, adding that the police administration covered the crime.
The former Openai employee was found dead in his apartment in a clear suicide in late last year, with the main examination office confirmed the body and his identity. Before his death, Openai Whistleblower was a former employee of the AI company, who was famous for his interview with the New York Times, where he accused the company of violating copyright laws.
Openai Whistleblower parents are looking for a legal victory
According to the lawyers who represent the prosecutors, Openai’s parents reported that after hearing the death of their son, they urged the authorities to conduct more investigations, but they were told that the case had already been closed. However, according to their lawyer Joseph Goths, petitioners want the authorities to issue the detained public records.
Joseph Goethez said: “The lawsuit demands the release of the city, the police administration and the medical examiner, the public documents that were withheld under the General Record Law,” said Joseph Goethez. He also stated that if the authorities fail to release the documents within 10 days and there are no valid exceptions, the lawsuit will indicate the release, indicating that the court will request their release.
In the lawsuit, the petitions have claimed that the San Francisco Police Administration acted against the California Public Record Law by blocking records aimed at issuing the public regarding the case. Lawyers also stated that the two affluations said that the investigations into the death of their son were quickly concluded, as officials ignored the main results, noting that they also ignored their appeal for more investigation.
Now, the lawsuit imposes the immediate issuance of all reports, videos and photos, as well as legal cost payments. According to Goethals, they are ready to search for remedies until they get what they want. “If the San Francisco Supreme Court does not explain and impose it on the law properly, we will seek to resort to the Court of Appeal. We hope that it will not reach that.”
Suchir Balaji’s Tursle with Openai
Palaji had worked in Openai from 2020 to 2024, leaving the company in August 2024. According to his interview with the New York Times, he stated that he helped the company collect a huge amount of data from the Internet without permission before its launch ChatgPt in November 2022. In a tweet of October He stated that he had no little idea of copyright and fair use until lawsuits began to appear against many artificial intelligence companies.
“When I tried to understand the problem better, I finally concluded that the fair use seems to be a largely unreasonable defense of the Obstetical Intelligence products, for the primary reason that can create alternatives to compete with the data trained on it, he said.
In the lawsuit, Openai Whistleblower’s parents or Openai Whistleblower stated that they participated in the service of the forensic pathology specialist, Dr. David Cohen, to carry out the autopsy. According to the doctor’s report, there was a gunshot in the middle of the deceased heads, a slight right in his nose bridge. Dr. Cohen also stated that his shot was unusual for suicide, because the bullet path did not appear.
He highlighted that the bullet moved down from the right angle to the right, and lost the brain and residence in the brain. Dr. Cohen’s report also mentioned a bruise in the back of the head of the deceased violations, which raised questions about the circumstances surrounding his death. Balji’s body was discovered in his apartment a week after he was called as the infringements of violations in a lawsuit against the New York Times against Openai. The CEO of Openai Sam Altman rejected the media company’s claims, noting that the lawsuit places it on the “wrong side of history.”
Cryptopolitan Academy: Are web3 errors to appeal? – Discover here