The courts and Trump administration have repeatedly clashed in two prominent migration cases this week, looming on the horizon with another confrontation in the Supreme Court.
Miles Parks, host:
President Donald Trump has moved at a rapid pace for his agenda, including his promise to collective deportation. But the strategy also left the administration in the midst of many legal battles, including with the Supreme Court. NPR Ximena Bustillo correspondent with me now. Hello, ximena.
Ximena Bustillo, Byline: Hello, Miles.
Gardens: So let’s start with immediate developments. Overnight, the Supreme Court issued an order against the president. What did that say?
Bustillo: Well, justice has issued an order that prevents administration from using the law of foreign enemies to remove people currently detained in the Bluebonnet detention facility in Texas. The matter came immediately after the middle of the eastern night, and only two – Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alto.
Gardens: Why is the specified detention center?
Bustillo: Yesterday, the American Civil Liberties Union caught the wind that there were migrants who were detained there who were receiving models entitled notice and a memo of anxiety and removal under the law of foreign enemies. The American Civil Liberties Union and other legal organizations submitted documents to the DC province court. They said that their customers obtained the models, which they claimed were members of the Tren de Aragua venezuelan gang and that immigration officers told them that they would be deported during the next day.
Now, a few weeks ago, the Supreme Court ruled that the administration could use the law of foreign enemies to deport people, but it had to ensure that these people obtain legal procedures and the opportunity to claim allegations, such as allegations that they are members of a gang. The American Civil Liberties Union argues that there was nothing on those forms that indicate how these people challenge the deportation or the time to do so. Therefore, they asked the DC James James Pasperj to issue a temporary restriction on the use of the law. But Boasberg denied the request, saying he did not believe he had a specialty to do so since he was in the capital, so the groups have appealed the Supreme Court.
Gardens: It seems that the law of foreign enemies has become a large part of the immigration battle now. Can you only remind us why management wants to use it?
Bustillo: Yes, the law of foreign enemies is the power of wartime that the president can protest. Trump did that last month, and it was mostly used in times of the actual announced war. The last time it was used during World War II. Basically, the law allows the administration to simplify the deportation and abandon the regular immigration court. This will be useful for Trump because he wants to accelerate these deportations and removal, and the Immigration Court can take months or even years.
ACLU and other groups were back away from the use of the verb. They argue that this is – the way the administration carries out – there are no legal procedures. Even when it was last used, there was at least a hearing plate that could hear a person’s case about why it was not removed.
The Supreme Court of Administration allows the use of the action, at least at the present time, and the American Civil Liberties Union told the American Federation that if they want to fight it, they must do this individually. Therefore, many lawsuits were submitted through the courts of provinces, some of which prevented administration from using this strategy with people who are being held in detention centers within the geographical jurisdiction of these courts. Now, let’s go back to Bluebonnet …
Gardens: Right.
Bustillo: … this facility in Texas. The American Civil Liberties Union argues that the administration was trying to move people there because it is one of the detention centers in Texas, which was currently not banned. Administration, though, denies that this is their strategy.
Gardens: Did the administration say anything at all since the Supreme Court came out with this ruling?
Bustillo: The White House did not issue an immediate response before the ruling was issued last night. An Internal Security spokesman told me that they are in line with the courts’ orders. The president also took the social truth to publish another video in the cinematic style of men who are removed from the aircraft and their heads, and then put in cells in Cecot. This is the notorious Megabriceon in El Salvador, where it was last again in the last 100 people with the law of foreign enemies.
Gardens: The administration, as we saw this week, was using El Salvador as a major partner in this removal. How does that look, and look forward?
Bustillo: Therefore, the Foreign Enemies Law was slowed due to many local court decisions, and of course the Supreme Court decision last night. But there are other ways that the administration sends people to Cecot. They still send some of the trips selected from the United States with those who claim to be members of the gangs, and this has sparked through the increasing alliance between Trump and President of Salvadori Nayeb Bokil. The agent said he wanted to expand this facility as well.
Parks: I think with every different – it looks like every day, we get something new – something from some courts regarding immigration at the present time. Can you go back and talk only about how to receive the entire immigration policy agenda in this administration in general?
Bustillo: I mean, it is definitely part of a mixed bag. They achieved some victories, and they also had some losses. Many of their efforts have been banned before or are still stuck in litigation with the courts. One of the great examples of this is that day 1 executive to impose restrictions on opinion. Remember that? The Supreme Court put an oral argument on three cases that challenge this next month. The administration has also received temporary restrictions, at the present time, preventing its attempts to cancel the conditional release position of more than half a million Cubans, Haitians, Nicaragua and Venezuelan who were about to lose their situation.
But as we are also discussing, they saw some victories, such as agreeing to benefit from the law of foreign enemies, at least at the present time, or the green light to ensure that every person in the United States occurs without legal status in registration with the federal government. There is more to find out what the administration goes to and how the judicial branch like all the new policies that Trump wants to implement.
Gardens: Thank you, NPR XIMENA Bustillo, to follow all this to us. Thank you very much.
Bustillo: Thank you for hosting me.
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Please visit the pages of the terms of use and permissions on the website on www.nprr.org for more information.
The accuracy and availability of NPR texts may vary. The text text may be reviewed to correct errors or match updates with the sound. The sound may be released on NPR.org after the original broadcast or post. The official record of NPR programming is the audio record.