The Federal judge temporarily suspended the Trump administration’s radical changes on how the National Institutes of Health have been searching for biomedical research and developing a plan to reduce research funding by the federal government.
Twenty -two lawyer, a lawsuit on Monday, filed Against the plan, which would limit how they pay universities and research institutes for “indirect costs”.
The lawsuit, which is listed by the National Institutes of Health and the Ministry of Health and Humanitarian Services as defendants, said that the impact of the indirect changes announced on Friday will be “immediate and destroyed.”
The National Health Institutes announced on Friday that it will be limited to indirect financing for research projects to 15 %, which greatly reduces the amount of funding that the federal government will provide for research agencies for things such as equipment, maintenance, facilities and support employees. Previously, these rates varied and negotiated by each institution with the government. The new policy entered on Monday For all grants to the National Institutes of New Health and any new expenses on current grants.
The lawsuit, which was filed on Monday in the US District Court in Massachusetts, led by public lawyers in Massachusetts, Illinois and Michigan, claims that the National Institutes of Health violated the Administrative Procedures Law, which governs the process of how to develop federal agencies and issue new regulations. It also claims that the administration has ignored the will of Congress, which included a designer judgment to prevent changes in indirect cost rates since 2018 and after the administration of President Donald Trump tried the first process of changing the process.
Angel Kelly, an American boycott judge, granted lawyers to request a temporary restriction, and order agencies not to take any steps to implement, implement or impose the new policy. Kelly set a personal hearing on February 21.
Kelly asks the agencies to submit reports, the first of which is due within 24 hours, to confirm that it continues to provide grant funds and take steps to comply with the restriction order, according to court documents.
Earlier on Monday in a separate case, a federal judge Rod Island spent that the Trump administration had violated his order to stop the freezing of federal financing.
Each state with a democratic act as a general lawyer is part of the new lawsuit.
The lawsuit says: “This agency will lead to the demobilization of workers, the suspension of clinical trials, the disruption of continuous research programs, and the closure of laboratories.” “The National Institutes of Exceptional Health to disrupt all existing and future grants do not pose an immediate threat to research infrastructure in the country, but it will also have a long -term impact on their research capabilities and their ability to provide life saving in scientific research.”
The National Health Institutes directed NBC news to comment on the Ministry of Health and Humanitarian Services, which did not provide a comment.
Scientists have described the discounts of indirect costs as Driconian and something that would prevent research efforts on diseases and basic sciences that may lead to new discoveries.
This will have a bad effect on the search. Michael Eisen, a professor and biologist at the University of California, Berkeley, said if you do not want the research to happen, you can accomplish it in this way.
It is possible to reduce indirect costs to reduce the burden of research financing away from the federal government, universities and individual research institutions, and many said they do not have funding to support it.
In a press release, the University of California system said that the national health institutes are the largest financier in its research and spent $ 2.6 billion on the system’s research during the last academic year. Changes in the National Health Institutes will reduce hundreds of millions of California University budget annually.
“This unwanted measure will lead to wide discounts of employees and services, including the effects of education, training, application for patients, basic research and clinical experiences,” said Teresa Maldonado, Vice President of the University of California Research, Research and Clinical Experiences. innovation. “It will be troubled for a long time, and it permanently destroys the time to take time in both basic and clinical research.”
Supporters of the transformation in the National Institutes of Health described indirect costs as general costs outside control.
in Published on Friday on xKatie Miller, who is appointed to the newly formed government efficiency, wrote: “President Trump gets rid of a liberal dean deans. This reduces only the price of Harvard’s obscene price that wanders by $ 250 million a year.”